@inproceedings{gray00chi.sig,
title = {The GOMS SIG: troubleshooting, lessons learned, novel applications, teaching techniques & future research},
author = { Wayne D. Gray and Bonnie E. John and David E. Kieras and Deborah A. Boehm Davis},
url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/633292.633466},
doi = {10.1145/633292.633466},
isbn = {1-58113-248-4},
year = {2000},
date = {2000-01-01},
booktitle = {CHI '00 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems},
pages = {297--297},
publisher = {ACM},
address = {The Hague, The Netherlands},
series = {CHI EA '00},
keywords = {ACT-R, cognitive modeling, cognitive task analysis, CPM-GOMS, EPIC, evaluation, GOMS, interaction design, NGOMSL, prototyping, soar, usability engineering},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inproceedings}
}
@article{kirsch96chiBul,
title = {Cognitive Architectures & HCI},
author = { Susan S. Kirschenbaum and Wayne D. Gray and Richard M. Young},
year = {1996},
date = {1996-01-01},
journal = {SIGCHI Bulletin},
volume = {28},
number = {2},
pages = {18-21},
abstract = {The Cognitive Architectures and Human- Computer Interaction Workshop examined computational cognitive modeling approaches to human-computer interaction issues (HCI). The five major architectures and variations represented were briefly summarized. Participants compared approaches to a set of selected HCI problems and alternative solutions, and compared the strengths and weaknesses of the architectures. A list of additional issues was generated and discussed.},
keywords = {3CAPS, ACT-R, cognitive architectures, computational cognitive modeling, construction-integration., EPIC, simulation, soar, user modeling},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The Cognitive Architectures and Human- Computer Interaction Workshop examined computational cognitive modeling approaches to human-computer interaction issues (HCI). The five major architectures and variations represented were briefly summarized. Participants compared approaches to a set of selected HCI problems and alternative solutions, and compared the strengths and weaknesses of the architectures. A list of additional issues was generated and discussed.
