@techreport{gray84ari,
title = {Implementation monitoring: A role for evaluators in helping new programs succeed},
author = { Wayne D. Gray},
year = {1984},
date = {1984-10-01},
number = {656},
address = {Alexandria, VA},
institution = {US Army Research Inst for the Behavioral & Social Sciences, Alexandria, VA.},
abstract = {Defines a framework for monitoring implementation. The framework requires a team of monitors who examine the adequacy of implementation plans and look at the effect of their execution on the organization, the individual, and the new program. Immediate feedback is provided to adjust the implementation effort. The framework defines questions to ask, shows why these questions are important, and how they can be used to increase implementation. ((c) 1997 APA/PsycINFO, all rights reserved).},
keywords = {*Organizational Change *Program Evaluation Monitoring Organizational Behavior [3660]. Human.},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
Defines a framework for monitoring implementation. The framework requires a team of monitors who examine the adequacy of implementation plans and look at the effect of their execution on the organization, the individual, and the new program. Immediate feedback is provided to adjust the implementation effort. The framework defines questions to ask, shows why these questions are important, and how they can be used to increase implementation. ((c) 1997 APA/PsycINFO, all rights reserved).
@techreport{gray84ari3,
title = {Implementing Army Training Programs: An Overview for Managers},
author = { Wayne D. Gray},
year = {1984},
date = {1984-10-01},
number = {1382},
address = {Alexandria, VA},
institution = {US Army Research Inst for the Behavioral & Social Sciences},
abstract = {An overview of implementation issues is presented. Implementation is viewed as an``organizational research & development`` stage. In this stage the user decides where a new program fits into the organization's priorities. The developer and user then work together to plot a *mutual accommodation``c-of the program to the organization and the organization to the program. This report is intended for developers and users of Army training programs. The intent is to identify the issues involved in implementation. The ultimate goal is to increase the effectiveness of training programs for a better trained Army.},
keywords = {*Organizational Change *Program Evaluation Monitoring Organizational Behavior [3660]. Human.},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
An overview of implementation issues is presented. Implementation is viewed as an``organizational research & development`` stage. In this stage the user decides where a new program fits into the organization's priorities. The developer and user then work together to plot a *mutual accommodation``c-of the program to the organization and the organization to the program. This report is intended for developers and users of Army training programs. The intent is to identify the issues involved in implementation. The ultimate goal is to increase the effectiveness of training programs for a better trained Army.
@techreport{gray84ari.rn,
title = {A Life-Cycle Approach to Implementing and Evaluating Army Training Programs},
author = { Wayne D. Gray},
year = {1984},
date = {1984-06-01},
number = {DTIC AD-A142 472},
address = {Alexandria, VA},
institution = {US Army Research Inst for the Behavioral & Social Sciences, Alexandria, VA.},
abstract = {Defines a framework for monitoring implementation. The framework requires a team of monitors who examine the adequacy of implementation plans and look at the effect of their execution on the organization, the individual, and the new program. Immediate feedback is provided to adjust the implementation effort. The framework defines questions to ask, shows why these questions are important, and how they can be used to increase implementation. ((c) 1997 APA/PsycINFO, all rights reserved).},
keywords = {*Organizational Change *Program Evaluation Monitoring Organizational Behavior [3660]. Human.},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
Defines a framework for monitoring implementation. The framework requires a team of monitors who examine the adequacy of implementation plans and look at the effect of their execution on the organization, the individual, and the new program. Immediate feedback is provided to adjust the implementation effort. The framework defines questions to ask, shows why these questions are important, and how they can be used to increase implementation. ((c) 1997 APA/PsycINFO, all rights reserved).
